“But surely this is
somewhat irrelevant?”
“Not entirely,” said
Holmes.
--Arthur Conan Doyle, “The Adventure of the Priory School”
Leigh:
We have another mystery this week
that focuses on bicycles. This time, more specifically bicycle tires instead of
people riding on them. We have a very important Duke whose son has gone missing
from school. The headmaster then contacts Sherlock Holmes and says that he's
missing along with the German teacher. Of course kidnap is the obvious red
herring here but it's a Sherlock Holmes mystery and these are rarely that
simple.
Holmes goes to the school to attempt to figure out the problem and
Watson and the audience actually gets to come along. Holmes and Watson go all
along every bit of field and anywhere there might be a path to find the bicycle
tire marks from the missing bicycle that was presumably used in the possible
kidnapping. They eventually find the trail and then the dead German teacher.
DUN DUN DUN!
My God..... |
And that's when the mystery gets exciting and slightly convoluted
and becomes a bit of a rip off. There's a worker who had been fired from the
Duke's home. There's an illegitimate son who's jealous of the Duke's younger
son. There's of course a murder and murderer and still a missing boy. Holmes
ends up solving the whole thing because the tread marks left by the cows along
the trails didn't follow a cow's natural stride. This annoyed me. Did it annoy
you?
I honestly didn't remember reading this one even though I'm pretty
sure I have. The whole mystery seemed less logical and more fantastical than
normal. Is this part of the new style that Doyle has created with this new book
or is it just a lack of planning?
Austin: I wasn't
bothered by those elements as much as you. The cow stride made enough sense to
me. Maybe it needed more of an explanation, but imagine when there are cartoon
footprints in the snow or in the dust they look like they were 100% flat
instead of someone leaning into the step. I imagine the science of a cow's
stride is actually quite fascinating.
I dug this one. It felt like another fun mystery where you can
really walk around the crime scene. This one is equipped with a personalized
map and I could easily imagine our heroes walking around the yard trying to
play out exactly what happened much like "Silver Blaze". Also it had
a really fun client entrance with the way he was described as a very frantic
man who quickly needed a pillow and brandy.
"Now I'm WET! And my student is missing....and I'm still hysterical!" |
I think often times for me, it's the change of locale that really
freshens up a Sherlock Holmes story. This priory school was a nice change of
pace, although I wish they snuck in a nod to Sherlock's origin story. (Or did
they? Was it too subtle?) I'm actually rather surprised that Doyle didn't use
this format to let Holmes go to wilder and more exotic locations, but even a
wide open space like this felt new and exciting.
Now, I'm curious exactly what you mean by this feeling less logical?
This actually was a couple more pages than the usual story. To me, it seemed
like Doyle wanted to go through step by step to go through all the pieces.
Leigh:
I liked the element of the cow
strides, I just felt like it was cheating. The audience can't see that clue and
if the strides were described in such a way that the audience would realize
there's something wrong with them, then it would feel like cheating the other
way. I liked the idea, I just wish it were executed better. And yes, the gait
of animals is fascinating.
And maybe "less logical" was a poor choice of words. To
me, it felt like there was added drama that didn't help the story. Sure the
bastard older son not liking the younger son was a good plot point but I feel
like, "just because he's the actual heir" is a lame excuse as to why
he doesn't like him. Sure, this was a time when inheriting something meant you
were set for life, but surely if his father cared as much for the older son as
he did the younger son, he would make sure that he would be taken care of in
some way or another. I know from Downton Abbey that breaking the entail is no
easy task but the Duke surely has more money elsewhere that isn't all going
towards the younger son. This is another one of those times where I feel like I
need a basic course in Victorian/Edwardian law to understand what's going on
and why. If there was the addition of having the younger son be an all around
dick, then maybe I could get behind the older son wanting to kidnap him for
ransom.
What is a "cow"? |
I also didn't understand why the Duke didn't just go and get his son.
I felt like this was a poorly described plot point. The Duke has more power and
money than some guy he fired, surely he could get his son and not leave him
with people who might kill him if they so decide. I felt that Sherlock Holmes
was right for judging him as harshly as he did. I also appreciated that Holmes
described kinda his code for who he turns over to the police and who he
doesn't. That was a nice insight into the character and we don't get those all
too often. As you said, this would've been a great time to reference Holmes'
background (if it was mentioned, I didn't get it either) but the audience isn't
told. I think that if it were written in a more modern time, then we would've
been told but we've talked before about how ACD just doesn't focus on that
aspect of the characters. Do we need to know Holmes' past to understand what is
going on? No, so why add it here?
I also like the
change of scenery. It makes the whole mystery feel different when at the end of
the story, the mystery probably would've been incredibly similar if it took
place in London instead of in the country. So is a new location enough to spice
up these stories or is there something more that we get from these field trips
that we wouldn't if we stayed home?
Austin: I think
with the Sherlock stories more than other mystery series, there's value in the
unexpected. When you have a cozy, the familiar is an asset as we continue to
investigate crimes that happen on the same island every time because the
characters and the town is so warm. Sherlock's world requires there not just to
be a crime, but a crime too ridiculous for the police to solve. It's the
extraordinary turned into something shockingly simple.
So the locations can help with that. When you're just standing in
rooms around London, it can grow stale. Yet if you use the 221B sitting room as
a jumping off point then it's exciting. When a client walks in, that means
these two and the audience can be whisked away to adventure which can involve
anything and anywhere.
Now I'm romanticizing the series quite a bit, because the Doyle
stories don't dramatically change its format every week. Aside from some crazy
flashbacks, we stay in the UK. I hope that with the remaining stories Doyle is
tempted by his exotic love and takes the characters into some weirder places.
Until then, I continue to value Doyle when he adds the extra bits of weirdness
into the world surrounding his readers. With the help of characters named
Thorneycroft and red herrings like gypsies.
This week we're going to change up the schedule a little bit and
review the season premiere of Elementary because we almost forgot
what our blog was called for a second. It introduced two major characters of
the Doyle canon so we figured we ought to check it out.
And here is
Leigh Montano with the final word....
Leigh: Moooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment